“We are a poor image quality because it is a child,” he said. “We use lead shielding on the sexual organs. This is something that radiologists around the country to do so. We have always been aware of the importance of keeping radiation exposure as minimal as possible, especially with children.”Radiologists are known to be conservative, following the orders of a physician for testing, he said. “We were called to challenge the doctor who ordered a study, do not think is indicated. We call them and ask:” What specifically are you looking for? We always consider the exposure to radiation. ”
In his article, Picano said that radiologists take different tacks when patients are asked to sign consent forms. “Do not say a word” about exposure to radiation is the most common approach, justified by the constraints of time, more experienced ‘paternalistic’ knows best “attitude, Picano writes.
The patients chest X-rays, body scans and other tests involving exposure to radiation do not receive sufficient information about risks, a new report.
His comment appears in British Medical Journal this week. United States, its success has led to alarm. “This is ridiculous, the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard,” Polly Kochan, MD, pediatric radiologist at Children Hospital in Temple, Philadelphia, tells WebMD. It is not reasonable.”
“These claims are probably inaccurate to reassure patients to avoid unnecessary concerns about an unavoidable risk,” Picano writes. “However, this attitude of” individual consent “can be misleading . [doctors] to underestimate the risk” of exposure to radiation.
Some radiologists choose to underestimate the risks of radiation exposure, he writes. A nuclear medicine test involves the injection of radioactive material – it could be said that the radiation exposure of patients is similar to a simple chest radiograph. In reality, however, said the dose ranges from 50-4000 chest radiographs, according to the procedure of nuclear medicine in particular.
For example, a child will receive a risk of death from cancer in 1000, but the risk of radiation exposure is often not discussed with parents, Eugenio Picano writes, MD, with the Institute of Clinical Physiology, a part of the National Council of Research in Pisa, Italy.
Especially in view of children, “we are very aware of the risks of exposure to radiation, we have always been, to use as little as possible to reach a diagnostic X-ray,” Kochan WebMD.
Technology has improved so much, especially the new CT scanners, radiation exposure is already minimized, WebMD.